Titles
T-Z
The citizen centered journey towards sustainable smart citie...The designed and the ad hoc: Dynamic remakings of street spa...The digitization gap in urban planningThe Discrepancy Between Spatial Pedestrian Accessibility and...The Fall Line: differential stress and deformationThe Green Hub: A resilient vision for Thessaloniki, GreeceThe impact of building façade characteristics on perceived ...The interdisciplinary timeline: Towards a new paradigm for e...The language of habitation: An investigation of housing term...The meaning of historic cities in the digital age: Genoa his...The new city that was born too oldThe reconstruction of Al Nuri Mosque in MosulThe Right to Heritage: UNESCO cachet and its limits in non-w...‘The Right to the City’ and the problem of TehranThe role of community advocacy in implementing transformativ...The Urban University: An Agent of ChangeThe vacillating sources of authority – The case of the Old...Thinking Making With: Suburbia and sympoetic tanglingTiny Living in Dortmund (Germany): An experiment in urban su...Towards a heliocentric urbanism? Reconsidering sunlight thro...Town-Gown 101: A new class of digital tools for engagement, ...Urban curriculums must address climate changeUrban Design and planning in globalized cities: The Berlin e...Urban farming in the context of healthy cities: Ten years of...Urbanizing nature, modernizing nations: Water infrastructure...User preferences for urban parks: Stated choice experiments ...Using comics to promote green and inclusive architectureVirtual Travel: Global opportunities to reduce the carbon fo...Visualising speed and injustice at an urban edge: Havana, Cu...Welcome & IntroductionWhat does tailoring mean when agile method ‘tailoring’ i...What makes a city: nature and agency in the creative literat...Where are walkable “Main Streets” in Dallas-Fort Worth? ...
Presenters
Schedule

Environments by Design

Health, Wellbeing and Place
What does tailoring mean when agile method ‘tailoring’ is considered? A concept-centric analysis of existing understandings of agile method tailoring
F. Shen & I. Stewart
2:00 pm - 3:30 pm

Abstract

Purpose: To challenge the understanding of ‘tailoring’ and the process of ‘tailoring’ when agile method tailoring is considered. More cost-effective agile methods will be achievable by appropriately considering the tailoring process in projects.

Methodology: The systematic literature review is applied to investigate the aspects of tailoring that are being ignored by the current tailoring processes. The analogic reasoning is chosen for the transfer of knowledge from the tailoring in the fashion industry to the tailoring of agile methods in project management.

Findings: This paper develops an analogical process model for tailoring agile methods. The results show that there is potential misaligned understandings and conflicting objectives from the project stakeholders and the project team. Some trial-and-errors happened and cost increased after applying tailored agile practices. The critical stages and key roles of agile method tailoring process need to be clarified to relevant project members. Some tailored agile methods are transferring the agile thinking from IT to other industries. Tailored agile techniques are aiming at help large projects to timely collaborate with different stakeholders, however, the complexity of the projects adds challenges to the tailoring process and the application.

Research limitations: The analysis dependents on existing researchers’ observations of agile method tailoring, and the findings have not yet been validated by empirical studies. 

Practical implications: This paper put forth a new perspective of understanding on ‘agile method tailoring’ to project managers. The analogic process of ‘tailoring’ facilitates project managers in collaborating with the customer, external stakeholders and project team members. 

Originality/value: This paper fills in the conceptualization of the agile method tailoring and offers practical help to the management of projects by opening the thinking of project managers involved in adapting the method to ensure a more thorough evaluation of ‘tailoring’ to enable a better ‘fit’ to their project context. 

Biography

Fangyuan Shen is a PhD student of Management of Projects in the School of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering in The University of Manchester. Her PhD project focuses on agile project management and its application on smart cities. The project includes: transferring of agile technology from software development to construction projects, agile method tailoring (techniques, roles and responsibilities, procedures), and comparative evaluation of smart city project management between China and UK. Before joining the PhD programme, Fangyuan holds two Masters’ degree in Public Administration & Policy and Commercial Project Management, and she has worked as an analyst for a UK consultant firm.

Dr Ian Stewart is a Reader in Management of Projects Education, Programme Director of the Manchester MSc in Management of Projects and is Head of the Management of Projects Research Group in the Department of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering, University of Manchester. He is also a Senior Fellow of the Higher Education Academy and has won various institutional and international awards for his work in projects education. His PhD was a combination of historical research into the descent of the role of ‘Commercial Manager’ into project-led organisations such as BT, RR & BAE and the practice of innovation within the project commercial role in those firms. This subject first bought him to the school in 2001 through teaching on the bespoke UMIST BT MSc in Commercial Management. From this, he claims the distinction of holding the final UMIST PhD. His current research interests are around the impact of AI and digitalisation on the activities and professional status of project managers, institution/private sector relationships in CSR on construction projects and the human cost of simulations and games in large-class pedagogy.