Opening up the built heritage conservation field to the »people-centred approaches«, and this way attempting to overcome the hierarchical, top-down »authorised heritage discourse« framework, represents a major challenge in terms of methodologies, but especially in terms of integrating the results of participatory research into the conservation procedures. This challenge is even more salient in territories marked by contested history, and thus heritage. In the paper, I would like to present the results of a recent research that aimed at analysing and proposing methods for participatory and engaged conservation in contested places, in case-studies in south-western Slovenia. The core question of the project aimed at developing inclusive and participatory approaches through the use of established and newer ethnographic methods, namely a method called “group memory talk”. However, the policy aspect turned out to be crucial in terms of moving from theory to practice. So, through two case-studies of historic spaces (a square in Koper/Capodistria, and a neighbourhood in Nove Gorica), the views on such paradigm-shift by the key stakeholders in the decision-making process (heritage conservation institute, municipality, architect, users) will be presented and compared, while options for actually integrating participatory research in conservation procedures will be pinpointed.
Neža Čebron Lipovec, MA in Art History, MSc in Conservation of Monuments and Sites, and PhD in History, has in the last decade been actively involved in the field of critical heritage studies research, focusing first on 20th-century architectural heritage and then on interdisciplinary approaches, ethnographic methods promoting participation in built heritage conservation in contested lands. Since 2009, she has been a research fellow and assistant professor at the University of Primorska, Faculty of Humanities, Institute of Archeology and Heritage, in Slovenia.