VIRTUAL Manchester Livable Cities

Abstract

Liveability frameworks are influential in health and urban policy for their emphasis on public health, wellbeing, and equity, yet as normative models they risk overlooking the needs of people with disability. This paper presents findings of a mixed-methods PhD study in Tasmania, Australia, a context that shares parallels with other post-industrial regions facing socio-economic inequality, high disability prevalence, and spatial disparities in public service provision. The study examined the relevance of a leading liveability framework, that of the Australian Urban Observatory, for adults with diverse disability. Guided by a consultation group of adults with disability, the research employed a mixed-methods design combining a state-wide survey (n = 103) with self-directed photography and elicitation interviews (n = 9). Survey data were analysed using descriptive statistics, while qualitative data were examined through deductive thematic analysis. Mixed methods integration involved converging qualitative and quantitative data against liveability framework indicators. Findings indicate that some liveability domains, such as housing and food, require refinement to better reflect accessibility, while others, e.g. walkability, social infrastructure, and public space need both revision of existing indicators and expansion with new measures. Several domains were contested, suggesting that liveability may be overestimated and risk exacerbating inequality. Policy responses may include advancing frameworks beyond proximity measures to integrate functionality and accessibility. Identified shortcomings may also be addressed by critically appraising evidence for local context and embedding participatory, place-based approaches for inclusive governance and universal design. Ultimately, inclusive liveability frameworks are essential to achieving future-focused urban areas that support the full and meaningful participation of people with disability in neighbourhood life.